Get Started
Research questionHow can LLM-agent systems prevent safety compromises from propagating across workflow boundaries?Prompt injection, tool misuse, and memory poisoning can appear as distinct attacks even when they exploit related failures at system interfaces. Without a shared view of those interfaces, it is difficult to identify where isolation first breaks or trace the compromise into execution.
AI Agents
Alignment & Safety
Multi-agent Systems
Latest papersRecent research connected to this question, newest first.Isolation as a First-Class Principle for LLM-Agent System Safety: Concepts, Taxonomy, Challenges and Future DirectionsThe source surveys LLM-agent safety across user-agent, agent-tool, agent-execution, agent-agent, and system-environment boundaries. It provides a conceptual taxonomy of cross-boundary failure paths and open challenges, including isolation-by-construction, rather than evidence from a specific deployment or a tested defense.research paper · Sep 2, 2026
Related questions
How can LLM agents stay safe during multi-step execution when both policy and runtime harness shape behavior?How can composable LLM agents preserve authorization and provenance across component boundaries before external effects?How can LLM agents make safe primary-care decisions as the action space grows?How can autonomous LLM agents detect attacks whose evidence accumulates across loop iterations?
Home
Topics
Search
Library