Get Started
Research questionHow do students distinguish AI-generated writing feedback’s usefulness from its authority to assign grades?AI-generated writing evaluations may provide actionable revision feedback while raising questions about whether an AI system should determine grades. Students’ reactions can therefore differ between accepting feedback and accepting the evaluator’s authority.
AI
Natural Language Processing
Latest papersRecent research connected to this question, newest first.Who Should Grade My Work? Student Perspectives on Transparent AI-Assisted Writing Assessment in Higher EducationThe evidence comes from a qualitative inquiry with 13 male undergraduate computing students in a technical communication course at a Saudi public university. Students completed an in-class handwritten writing task, received rubric-based scores and feedback generated by ChatGPT from scanned submissions, and then reflected after being told that AI produced the evaluation. The findings represent participant perspectives in this instructional setting.research paper · Sep 4, 2026
Related questions
How can AI-assisted scoring reduce grading workload in national assessments without compromising human-judged scores or pass/fail decisions?How can we distinguish AI assistance from AI authorship when the prompting dialogue is unavailable?How can LLMs assess academic proposals and peer feedback with pedagogically grounded scores?How can AI-assisted peer review reduce unsupported criticisms without overlooking consequential weaknesses?
Home
Topics
Search
Library